Jul. 07, 2025
In principal, is it safe to use an M10 lug on an M8 stud/hole (using 8mm nuts/screws), as long as the surface area around the M10 lug is in contact with the metal plate surrounding the post/hole?I have done it. But literally “in principle” it is not ok on one hand and suboptimal on the other. It’s going to be held on tight enough, but on a W! 12V system there’s a lot of current potential that needs to happen at the point of contact.
Is it safe and accepted practice to have multiple lugs on a single post/hole?No. People do it; I might do it if the battery to inverter was on the bottom and a small/thin meter/sensor ring terminal was on top or maybe an SCC output was on top in a smaller system. Most often, however, the bolt length will lose a couple of threads which weakens the potential holding power of the threads. I use a busbar.
Am I still ok to use these undersized busbars as long as my inverter lugs and battery lugs are on the same post (thus, in theory, no current from the battery is going through the bus bar) ?I have done that when my system was 200W but undersized anything is a poor idea. Just get bigger busbars? Victron is quality stuff and will probably “take it” but fires don’t care about “probably.”
What is the tradeoff of doing 1-3 above vs just reordering cables with correct lugsjust buy the tinned terminal ends of the right size and an appropriate hex crimper for your probably 4/0 or 3/0 cables. That will likely cost nearly the same as new cables.
however this isn't financially viableI have bought decent multi-sizes bare-crimp ring terminals that are decent quality and thickness for like $20
I wouldn't bat an eye putting a M10 on a M8 post.Not being argumentative here, but for just a few bucks you can buy the right sized ring terminal ends; he’s doing W nominal and on 12V that’s ~330A+ - I’m admittedly ‘heat sensitive’ and oversize batt-inverter cables so I’m askeered of the reduction in contact area. ? Call me chicken.
permitted you put the highest current lugs the closest to the bus bars. Victron's 250A and 600A bus bars are drastically underrated and I would never bat an eye pushing way more than 250A through their 250A barsthe bus bar will accept that with plenty of threads; the three batteries I’ve experienced barely have enough bolt length in aluminum or brass for one ring terminal imho. Maybe I’m wrong or too skeered; could be.
If your system is going to be in indoors, and not subject to a harsh environment go with plain copper and not tin coated lugs. Copper to copper will be the best conductivity.True. Myopia of me living in Vermont makes me like the tinned terminals.
just would like to understand lug connectivity betterThe more contact surface area the less the resistance. Less resistance less chances of heat build. Heat and fire is my OCD with stuff.
I endorse everything 12VInstalls stated in his post with one exceptionAnd I endorse what you said?
Multiple lugs require that you do not place anything between them such as a washeri should have said that; washer under the nut only.
Not being argumentative here, but for just a few bucks you can buy the right sized ring terminal ends; he’s doing W nominal and on 12V that’s ~330A+ - I’m admittedly ‘heat sensitive’ and oversize batt-inverter cables so I’m askeered of the reduction in contact area. ? Call me chicken.I don't mean to argue either. Just in my opinion, 1/32nd of an inch all the way around seems like we are literally splitting hairs here.
barely have enough bolt length in aluminum or brass for one ring terminal imhoI am referring specifically to the bus bar in this case with a stud connection that has plenty of threads. A battery that has a bolt and barely enough threads to reach the proper torque is a different circumstance entirely. Hi All
only m10-on-m8 will be the ends of the battery and inverter cables on the busbarBecause a busbar is typically a plate there is no compromise of contact area. I would be ok with that- I think two of my busbar rings from the batteries are ‘too big’ and I used them because I don’t have another application for the larger ring terminals so I was being acceptably ‘cheap’ because I reasoned it was of no consequence.
comments on my battery+inverter cables picture - is this the "best" way to mount 2 m10s on top of each otherWell the nut threads are fully engaged so that’s a non-issue. And as long as the battery ring terminal is on the bottom with no washer under it, the SCC cable terminal is essentially mounted in a way that is closest to the battery… so I’d say it’s acceptable as well. Maybe it’s because I’m on my I can’t see it, but if a) the nut is not a flanged nut at a minimum and b) there is enough thread depth to permit a washer I’d ideally want a washer between the nut and the terminal. The primary purpose of a screw or stud is to provide compression pressure on two interfacing conductive surfaces. At a microscopic level the two interfaces of flat conductive surfaces are an irregular, rough interface.
Well the nut threads are fully engaged so that’s a non-issue. And as long as the battery ring terminal is on the bottom with no washer under it, the SCC cable terminal is essentially mounted in a way that is closest to the battery… so I’d say it’s acceptable as well. Maybe it’s because I’m on my I can’t see it, but if a) the nut is not a flanged nut at a minimum and b) there is enough thread depth to permit a washer I’d ideally want a washer between the nut and the terminal.No flanged nuts are being used. I'm using the standard design that victron recommends in their docs: nut->washer->nut->lug (or in my case, 2xm10 lugs). You can see this here: https://www.victronenergy.com/upload/documents/Datasheet-Busbar-250-A-4P-and-6P-with-cover-EN.pdf
The connections on the actual batteries and inverter themselves will be correct (m8 lug on m8 battery terminal, m10 lug on m10 inverter terminal). Furthermore, my batteries are 2 x LifePo4 batteries in parallelfine
This is what I have
namely, the angles of the 2 m10s to each other is of questionOther than my ocd not liking the 92.3* angle instead of a machinist’s true 90* ? LOL that’s fine.
No flanged nuts are being used. I'm using the standard design that victron recommends in their docs: nut->washer->nut->lug (or in my case, 2xm10 lugs)Fine. Electrical flanged nuts have circumferential ridges that sortof act like a locking facility for the nut, but proper torque of the lower nut then ‘jammed’ by the top nut over a washer is just as effective or more so. I like a flanged / washer head nut at a minimum but prefer a washer between the terminal and the nut to not present rotational force on the terminal as well as present the clamping force over more surface area while not deforming the terminal in any fashion.
If you are looking for more details, kindly visit Electric Powertek.
For more cable lug manufacturerinformation, please contact us. We will provide professional answers.
Please visit our website for more information on this topic.
Previous: None
If you are interested in sending in a Guest Blogger Submission,welcome to write for us!
All Comments ( 0 )